Agentic software quality

I recently attended an agentic developer conference that posed a few philosophical questions: Humans use a lot of software; humans have traditionally been associated with the software development process. Can agents produce better software for humans than humans themselves make with older tools? Is agentic software development dazzled by the promise of software improvement even though the real measure of quality is arguably a human judgement rather than a machine one?

 

Are human developers in the strongest position with hand crafting tools like classic IDEs or does having agents improve software quality, is the answer subjective and will it depend on the client’s preference?

 

Time will tell, keep in mind that the final preference is likely to come from users.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Build in a quantum simulator into the OS to run on classic hardware architecture and sell as a Quantum Computer